Trends in education, 2009 (vol. 2), issue 1

TVV 2009, 2(1):121-124

SCHOOL'S WORK QUALITY VS EDUCATIONAL PROCESS' DOCUMENTATION

MASTALERZ Elżbieta
Kraków, elzbietamastalerz@wp.pl

Quality increase is one of modern phenomena. It is a primary goal, which today's educational systems should strive to achieve. One of many changes implemented by quality management is evaluation, which is a process of grading or describing events, purposeful and systematic, according to set standards. It's a process of gathering information about undertaken enterprises, that is subject to methodological rules. For education, quality equals accordance to standards. Those standards are set in fields of: requirements, achievement levels, behavior, progress indicators and proofs of achievements. School's work quality is measured by comparing its' effects with set goals and targets, diagnosis of certain schoolwork areas, regular measuring of school's work quality, investigating student's academic achievements. Measuring it means following school's educational activity and academic achievements, and comparing them with set quality standards. It is meaningful if it helps to enter higher quality levels. This article describes the documents and processes required for direct, systematic educational process, indispensable to proper monitoring of schoolwork quality.

Keywords: quality, documentation, evaluation.

Published: July 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
MASTALERZ, E. (2009). SCHOOL'S WORK QUALITY VS EDUCATIONAL PROCESS' DOCUMENTATION. Trends in education, 2(1), 121-124
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Goźlińska E.: Ściąga dla nauczycieli, czyli co nauczyciel musi, co może a co powinien, Wyd. WSiP, Warszawa, 2005.
    2. Hrmo R., Mistina J.: TQM In Engineering Pedagogy Curricula [w] Problems of modern techniques in engineering and education, PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF CRACOW INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, red. P.Kurtyka, P.Malczewski, K.Mroczka, I.Sulima, Kraków, 2007r., s.193-197, ISBN 978-83-7271-459-6.
    3. Krauz A.: Kwalifikacje zawodowe - jak syndrom wartości i aktualnych potrzeb, [w] Furmanek W., Z badań nad wartościami w pedagogice, UR, Rzeszów 2006, ISBN 8388845-65-9, s. 261-268.
    4. Mastalerz E: Kształcenie umiejętności nauczyciela w zakresie planowania pracy dydaktycznej [w] SCHOLA 2006 Kvalita vychovy a vzdelavania, Wyd. Slovenska Technicka Univerzita w Bratyslave, 2006, s.262-268.
    5. Olejniczak T., Pielachowski J.: Nadzór pedagogiczny i organizacyjny nad placówkami oświatowymi, Wyd. eMPi, Poznań, 2005.
    6. Pielachowski J.: Organizacja i zarządzanie oświatą i szkołą, Wyd. eMPi, Poznań, 2002.
    7. Szubański R.: Nadzór pedagogiczny sprawowany przez dyrektora szkoły, Wyd. Szkolne PWN, Warszawa-Łódź, 2001.
    8. Tvarůžka V., Rudolf L.,: Systémový pohled na digitální vizuální záznam v technologické edukaci, sborník příspěvků z mezinárodní vědecko - odborné konference, ISBN 80 - 7220 - 260 - X, Mezinárodní konference na Univerzitě Palackého v Olomouci: Trendy ve vzdělávání, Olomouc 20. - 21. 6. 2006.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content