Trends in education, 2018 (vol. 11), issue 1
TVV 2018, 11(1):11-23 | DOI: 10.5507/tvv.2018.007
VERIFICATION TAXONOMY OF TEACHERS IN TERMS OF THEIR APPROACHES TO AND VIEWS ON ICT TOOLS
- Milan Klement, doc. PhDr. Ph.D.,
- Katedra technické a informační výchovy, Pedagogická fakulta UP, Žižkovo nám. 5, 771 40 Olomouc, ČR, tel.: 00420 585 635 5811, fax +420 585 231 400, e-mail: milan.klement@upol.cz
Is it possible to categorize teachers by their approach to modern technology? Are there groups of teachers who use modern technology uncritically? On the contrary, is there a larger group of teachers and educators who actively oppose this use? These are some of the questions which the submitted paper attempts to find the answer to. Based on the aforementioned assumptions, we proceeded to analyze the methods and approaches to the use of ICT tools by the teachers at primary and secondary schools with using pedagogical research methods. The acquired research data was subjected to statistical analysis using multidimensional statistical methods to verify whether the existing teachers' taxonomy by E. Rogers, the teaching staff member in terms of their access to ICT tools, is still valid or needs to be revised.
Keywords: modern technologies, ICT tools, teachers' taxonomy.
Received: June 19, 2018; Accepted: July 12, 2018; Prepublished online: July 12, 2018; Published: October 1, 2018 Show citation
References
- Brdička, B. (2010). Informační a komunikační technologie ve škole. Praha, Vydavatelství UK, 68 s.
- Brdička, B., Neumajer, O., & Růžičková, D. (2012). ICT v životě školy - Profil školy21. Praha: Národní ústav pro vzdělávání, 35 s.
- Gavora, P. (2010). Úvod do pedagogického výzkumu. Brno: Paido. 261 s.
- Chráska, M. & Kočvarová, I. (2015). Kvantitativní metody sběru dat v pedagogických výzkumech. Zlín: Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně, Fakulta humanitních studií. 132 s.
- Janík, T. (2005). Znalost jako klíčová kategorie učitelského vzdělávání. Brno: Paido. 139 s.
- Jonassen, D. H. et al. (2003). Learning to Solve Problems with technology: A Constructivist Perspective. New Jersey: Merill Prentice Hall. 421 s.
- Klímek, P., Stříž, P. & Kasal, R. (2009). Počítačové zpracování dat v programu STATISTICA. Bučovice: Martin Stříž. 102 s.
- Mandinach, E. B., & Cline, H. F. (2004). Classroom dynamics: Implementing a technology-based learning environment. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 203 s.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Dostupné z: http://punya.edic.msu.edu/reserch/tcpk
Go to original source...
- Neumajer, O., Rohlíková, L., & Zounek, J. (2015). Učíme se s tabletem: využití mobilních technologií ve vzdělávání. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 188 s.
- Prensky, M. (2009). Homo Sapiens Digital: From Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom. Innovate 5(3), [cit. 2016-01-03]. Dostupné z: http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol5_issue3/H._Sapiens_Digital_From_Digital_Immigrants_and_Digital_Natives_to_Digital_Wisdom.pdf
- Rogers. E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press, 262 s.
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and reserch programs in the study of teaching. In M. Wittrock, Handbook of research on teaching. New York: MacMillan. 238 s.
- Šimonová, I. (2010). Styly učení v aplikacích eLearningu. Hradec Králové: M&V.
- Zounek, J., & Šeďová, K. (2009). Učitelé a technologie: mezi tradičním a moderním pojetím. Brno: Paido, 172 s.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.